In one of our Customer engagements, the organization is transitioning to Spotify kind of Agile approach. In this context the role of Delivery\/People Managers is changing to Chapter Leads. They form a matrix structure with Squad Leads. Their role is changing from Delivery ownership to Capability\/Competence enablement role. How to help them to transition to the new role smoothly?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Suggested Solution<\/strong>
In their new role as Chapter Leads, they will have to unlearn some of the past approaches and learn a few new things:
\u2013 They need to let go of the past control-oriented ownership. And need to let go of the hierarchical mindset, as the new structure brings a matrix-oriented way of engaging.
\u2013 They need to embrace more facilitative and collaborative approaches as they need to engage with different components of the flat network-oriented organization.
\u2013 They need to learn to work with shared accountability and responsibilities that come in the matrix structure, which require more of networking, relationship-building and influencing skills. They need to be more self-organizing, taking ownership and reaching out to different parts of the matrix organization as needed.
\u2013 Trying to define the roles very clearly in a matrix structure will lead to creating silos as people will tend to go by the role specification; but this is an antipattern of matrix structure which is designed for breaking down silos. Hence the roles will have certain fuzziness and overlap which the Chapter Leads need to learn to work with\/leverage.
\u2013 They need to develop more servant leadership qualities to develop people capabilities & competencies.
In summary, Chapter Leads need to focus on adopting to new mindset more than the new processes.
As Sivaguru puts it, Tribes are about Purpose, Squads are about Autonomy and Chapters are about Mastery. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Chow #153 - Chapter Leads' Challenges","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"chow-153-chapter-leads-challenges","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13054","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"epic_block_11"};
Vishu<\/a><\/p>\n","post_title":"Agile Leadership Canvas - Cultivating Agile Mindset and Culture","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"agile-leadership-canvas-cultivating-agile-mindset-and-culture","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13556","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":13054,"post_author":"33","post_date":"2019-06-16 17:37:07","post_date_gmt":"2019-06-16 12:07:07","post_content":"\n In one of our Customer engagements, the organization is transitioning to Spotify kind of Agile approach. In this context the role of Delivery\/People Managers is changing to Chapter Leads. They form a matrix structure with Squad Leads. Their role is changing from Delivery ownership to Capability\/Competence enablement role. How to help them to transition to the new role smoothly?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Suggested Solution<\/strong> Glad it\u2019s working. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Vishu<\/a><\/p>\n","post_title":"Agile Leadership Canvas - Cultivating Agile Mindset and Culture","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"agile-leadership-canvas-cultivating-agile-mindset-and-culture","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13556","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":13054,"post_author":"33","post_date":"2019-06-16 17:37:07","post_date_gmt":"2019-06-16 12:07:07","post_content":"\n In one of our Customer engagements, the organization is transitioning to Spotify kind of Agile approach. In this context the role of Delivery\/People Managers is changing to Chapter Leads. They form a matrix structure with Squad Leads. Their role is changing from Delivery ownership to Capability\/Competence enablement role. How to help them to transition to the new role smoothly?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Suggested Solution<\/strong> As we take Leadership teams\nthrough experiential workshops on Agile Leadership Canvas and follow up with\ncoaching, we are witnessing significant engagement of Leaders in active Agile\nTransformation. It\u2019s gratifying to see how this in turn is influencing the\nbehaviour changes at the Team level. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Glad it\u2019s working. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Vishu<\/a><\/p>\n","post_title":"Agile Leadership Canvas - Cultivating Agile Mindset and Culture","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"agile-leadership-canvas-cultivating-agile-mindset-and-culture","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13556","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":13054,"post_author":"33","post_date":"2019-06-16 17:37:07","post_date_gmt":"2019-06-16 12:07:07","post_content":"\n In one of our Customer engagements, the organization is transitioning to Spotify kind of Agile approach. In this context the role of Delivery\/People Managers is changing to Chapter Leads. They form a matrix structure with Squad Leads. Their role is changing from Delivery ownership to Capability\/Competence enablement role. How to help them to transition to the new role smoothly?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Suggested Solution<\/strong> EQ can not be developed just by training\npeople, as it\u2019s not an intellectual exercise \u2013 it involves behaviour changes.\nIt has been found through research (Google-Stanford research through \u2018Search\nInside Yourself\u2019 program is an example), that Mindfulness practices are the\npractical way to develop\/enhance EQ, as they bring about transformation in\nbrain, nervous system & endocrine system, which impact the thinking,\nemotions, moods & behaviours. <\/p>\n\n\n\n As we take Leadership teams\nthrough experiential workshops on Agile Leadership Canvas and follow up with\ncoaching, we are witnessing significant engagement of Leaders in active Agile\nTransformation. It\u2019s gratifying to see how this in turn is influencing the\nbehaviour changes at the Team level. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Glad it\u2019s working. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Vishu<\/a><\/p>\n","post_title":"Agile Leadership Canvas - Cultivating Agile Mindset and Culture","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"agile-leadership-canvas-cultivating-agile-mindset-and-culture","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13556","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":13054,"post_author":"33","post_date":"2019-06-16 17:37:07","post_date_gmt":"2019-06-16 12:07:07","post_content":"\n In one of our Customer engagements, the organization is transitioning to Spotify kind of Agile approach. In this context the role of Delivery\/People Managers is changing to Chapter Leads. They form a matrix structure with Squad Leads. Their role is changing from Delivery ownership to Capability\/Competence enablement role. How to help them to transition to the new role smoothly?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Suggested Solution<\/strong> Mindful Leadership<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n EQ can not be developed just by training\npeople, as it\u2019s not an intellectual exercise \u2013 it involves behaviour changes.\nIt has been found through research (Google-Stanford research through \u2018Search\nInside Yourself\u2019 program is an example), that Mindfulness practices are the\npractical way to develop\/enhance EQ, as they bring about transformation in\nbrain, nervous system & endocrine system, which impact the thinking,\nemotions, moods & behaviours. <\/p>\n\n\n\n As we take Leadership teams\nthrough experiential workshops on Agile Leadership Canvas and follow up with\ncoaching, we are witnessing significant engagement of Leaders in active Agile\nTransformation. It\u2019s gratifying to see how this in turn is influencing the\nbehaviour changes at the Team level. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Glad it\u2019s working. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Vishu<\/a><\/p>\n","post_title":"Agile Leadership Canvas - Cultivating Agile Mindset and Culture","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"agile-leadership-canvas-cultivating-agile-mindset-and-culture","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13556","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":13054,"post_author":"33","post_date":"2019-06-16 17:37:07","post_date_gmt":"2019-06-16 12:07:07","post_content":"\n In one of our Customer engagements, the organization is transitioning to Spotify kind of Agile approach. In this context the role of Delivery\/People Managers is changing to Chapter Leads. They form a matrix structure with Squad Leads. Their role is changing from Delivery ownership to Capability\/Competence enablement role. How to help them to transition to the new role smoothly?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Suggested Solution<\/strong> Foundation for all such behaviour\nis Emotional Intelligence (EQ), which is the bedrock of Leadership.\nSelf-Awareness, Self-Regulation, Self-Motivation, Empathy & Social Skills\nare the five dimensions\/tenets of Emotional Intelligence. Self-Awareness is\ncentral to higher EQ, followed by Self-Regulation, Motivation, Empathy and\nSocial Skills. Typically, our Education Systems and Corporate Performance\nManagement Systems being more IQ oriented, higher EQ people tend to get filtered\nout of the system. Additional effort & focus is needed to enhance\/develop\nEQ, in Leaders as well as in Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Mindful Leadership<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n EQ can not be developed just by training\npeople, as it\u2019s not an intellectual exercise \u2013 it involves behaviour changes.\nIt has been found through research (Google-Stanford research through \u2018Search\nInside Yourself\u2019 program is an example), that Mindfulness practices are the\npractical way to develop\/enhance EQ, as they bring about transformation in\nbrain, nervous system & endocrine system, which impact the thinking,\nemotions, moods & behaviours. <\/p>\n\n\n\n As we take Leadership teams\nthrough experiential workshops on Agile Leadership Canvas and follow up with\ncoaching, we are witnessing significant engagement of Leaders in active Agile\nTransformation. It\u2019s gratifying to see how this in turn is influencing the\nbehaviour changes at the Team level. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Glad it\u2019s working. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Vishu<\/a><\/p>\n","post_title":"Agile Leadership Canvas - Cultivating Agile Mindset and Culture","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"agile-leadership-canvas-cultivating-agile-mindset-and-culture","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13556","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":13054,"post_author":"33","post_date":"2019-06-16 17:37:07","post_date_gmt":"2019-06-16 12:07:07","post_content":"\n In one of our Customer engagements, the organization is transitioning to Spotify kind of Agile approach. In this context the role of Delivery\/People Managers is changing to Chapter Leads. They form a matrix structure with Squad Leads. Their role is changing from Delivery ownership to Capability\/Competence enablement role. How to help them to transition to the new role smoothly?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Suggested Solution<\/strong> Cornerstones of Agile Culture are\nFacilitative Leadership, Self-Organization and Collaboration<\/strong> across\ndifferent Functions & Units. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Foundation for all such behaviour\nis Emotional Intelligence (EQ), which is the bedrock of Leadership.\nSelf-Awareness, Self-Regulation, Self-Motivation, Empathy & Social Skills\nare the five dimensions\/tenets of Emotional Intelligence. Self-Awareness is\ncentral to higher EQ, followed by Self-Regulation, Motivation, Empathy and\nSocial Skills. Typically, our Education Systems and Corporate Performance\nManagement Systems being more IQ oriented, higher EQ people tend to get filtered\nout of the system. Additional effort & focus is needed to enhance\/develop\nEQ, in Leaders as well as in Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Mindful Leadership<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n EQ can not be developed just by training\npeople, as it\u2019s not an intellectual exercise \u2013 it involves behaviour changes.\nIt has been found through research (Google-Stanford research through \u2018Search\nInside Yourself\u2019 program is an example), that Mindfulness practices are the\npractical way to develop\/enhance EQ, as they bring about transformation in\nbrain, nervous system & endocrine system, which impact the thinking,\nemotions, moods & behaviours. <\/p>\n\n\n\n As we take Leadership teams\nthrough experiential workshops on Agile Leadership Canvas and follow up with\ncoaching, we are witnessing significant engagement of Leaders in active Agile\nTransformation. It\u2019s gratifying to see how this in turn is influencing the\nbehaviour changes at the Team level. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Glad it\u2019s working. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Vishu<\/a><\/p>\n","post_title":"Agile Leadership Canvas - Cultivating Agile Mindset and Culture","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"agile-leadership-canvas-cultivating-agile-mindset-and-culture","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13556","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":13054,"post_author":"33","post_date":"2019-06-16 17:37:07","post_date_gmt":"2019-06-16 12:07:07","post_content":"\n In one of our Customer engagements, the organization is transitioning to Spotify kind of Agile approach. In this context the role of Delivery\/People Managers is changing to Chapter Leads. They form a matrix structure with Squad Leads. Their role is changing from Delivery ownership to Capability\/Competence enablement role. How to help them to transition to the new role smoothly?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Suggested Solution<\/strong> Emotional Intelligence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Cornerstones of Agile Culture are\nFacilitative Leadership, Self-Organization and Collaboration<\/strong> across\ndifferent Functions & Units. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Foundation for all such behaviour\nis Emotional Intelligence (EQ), which is the bedrock of Leadership.\nSelf-Awareness, Self-Regulation, Self-Motivation, Empathy & Social Skills\nare the five dimensions\/tenets of Emotional Intelligence. Self-Awareness is\ncentral to higher EQ, followed by Self-Regulation, Motivation, Empathy and\nSocial Skills. Typically, our Education Systems and Corporate Performance\nManagement Systems being more IQ oriented, higher EQ people tend to get filtered\nout of the system. Additional effort & focus is needed to enhance\/develop\nEQ, in Leaders as well as in Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Mindful Leadership<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n EQ can not be developed just by training\npeople, as it\u2019s not an intellectual exercise \u2013 it involves behaviour changes.\nIt has been found through research (Google-Stanford research through \u2018Search\nInside Yourself\u2019 program is an example), that Mindfulness practices are the\npractical way to develop\/enhance EQ, as they bring about transformation in\nbrain, nervous system & endocrine system, which impact the thinking,\nemotions, moods & behaviours. <\/p>\n\n\n\n As we take Leadership teams\nthrough experiential workshops on Agile Leadership Canvas and follow up with\ncoaching, we are witnessing significant engagement of Leaders in active Agile\nTransformation. It\u2019s gratifying to see how this in turn is influencing the\nbehaviour changes at the Team level. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Glad it\u2019s working. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Vishu<\/a><\/p>\n","post_title":"Agile Leadership Canvas - Cultivating Agile Mindset and Culture","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"agile-leadership-canvas-cultivating-agile-mindset-and-culture","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13556","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":13054,"post_author":"33","post_date":"2019-06-16 17:37:07","post_date_gmt":"2019-06-16 12:07:07","post_content":"\n In one of our Customer engagements, the organization is transitioning to Spotify kind of Agile approach. In this context the role of Delivery\/People Managers is changing to Chapter Leads. They form a matrix structure with Squad Leads. Their role is changing from Delivery ownership to Capability\/Competence enablement role. How to help them to transition to the new role smoothly?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Suggested Solution<\/strong> They also need to understand the\nWhys of Agile \u2013 the rationale behind Agile practices & principles. For\nexample, why Scrum Master role is very important, why they should not compare\nVelocity across Teams etc. Without such understanding, they might make\nanti-agile choices\/decisions based on past traditional thinking and drive the\nsame old behaviours in the Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Emotional Intelligence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Cornerstones of Agile Culture are\nFacilitative Leadership, Self-Organization and Collaboration<\/strong> across\ndifferent Functions & Units. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Foundation for all such behaviour\nis Emotional Intelligence (EQ), which is the bedrock of Leadership.\nSelf-Awareness, Self-Regulation, Self-Motivation, Empathy & Social Skills\nare the five dimensions\/tenets of Emotional Intelligence. Self-Awareness is\ncentral to higher EQ, followed by Self-Regulation, Motivation, Empathy and\nSocial Skills. Typically, our Education Systems and Corporate Performance\nManagement Systems being more IQ oriented, higher EQ people tend to get filtered\nout of the system. Additional effort & focus is needed to enhance\/develop\nEQ, in Leaders as well as in Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Mindful Leadership<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n EQ can not be developed just by training\npeople, as it\u2019s not an intellectual exercise \u2013 it involves behaviour changes.\nIt has been found through research (Google-Stanford research through \u2018Search\nInside Yourself\u2019 program is an example), that Mindfulness practices are the\npractical way to develop\/enhance EQ, as they bring about transformation in\nbrain, nervous system & endocrine system, which impact the thinking,\nemotions, moods & behaviours. <\/p>\n\n\n\n As we take Leadership teams\nthrough experiential workshops on Agile Leadership Canvas and follow up with\ncoaching, we are witnessing significant engagement of Leaders in active Agile\nTransformation. It\u2019s gratifying to see how this in turn is influencing the\nbehaviour changes at the Team level. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Glad it\u2019s working. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Vishu<\/a><\/p>\n","post_title":"Agile Leadership Canvas - Cultivating Agile Mindset and Culture","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"agile-leadership-canvas-cultivating-agile-mindset-and-culture","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13556","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":13054,"post_author":"33","post_date":"2019-06-16 17:37:07","post_date_gmt":"2019-06-16 12:07:07","post_content":"\n In one of our Customer engagements, the organization is transitioning to Spotify kind of Agile approach. In this context the role of Delivery\/People Managers is changing to Chapter Leads. They form a matrix structure with Squad Leads. Their role is changing from Delivery ownership to Capability\/Competence enablement role. How to help them to transition to the new role smoothly?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Suggested Solution<\/strong> Whys of Agile<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n They also need to understand the\nWhys of Agile \u2013 the rationale behind Agile practices & principles. For\nexample, why Scrum Master role is very important, why they should not compare\nVelocity across Teams etc. Without such understanding, they might make\nanti-agile choices\/decisions based on past traditional thinking and drive the\nsame old behaviours in the Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Emotional Intelligence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Cornerstones of Agile Culture are\nFacilitative Leadership, Self-Organization and Collaboration<\/strong> across\ndifferent Functions & Units. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Foundation for all such behaviour\nis Emotional Intelligence (EQ), which is the bedrock of Leadership.\nSelf-Awareness, Self-Regulation, Self-Motivation, Empathy & Social Skills\nare the five dimensions\/tenets of Emotional Intelligence. Self-Awareness is\ncentral to higher EQ, followed by Self-Regulation, Motivation, Empathy and\nSocial Skills. Typically, our Education Systems and Corporate Performance\nManagement Systems being more IQ oriented, higher EQ people tend to get filtered\nout of the system. Additional effort & focus is needed to enhance\/develop\nEQ, in Leaders as well as in Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Mindful Leadership<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n EQ can not be developed just by training\npeople, as it\u2019s not an intellectual exercise \u2013 it involves behaviour changes.\nIt has been found through research (Google-Stanford research through \u2018Search\nInside Yourself\u2019 program is an example), that Mindfulness practices are the\npractical way to develop\/enhance EQ, as they bring about transformation in\nbrain, nervous system & endocrine system, which impact the thinking,\nemotions, moods & behaviours. <\/p>\n\n\n\n As we take Leadership teams\nthrough experiential workshops on Agile Leadership Canvas and follow up with\ncoaching, we are witnessing significant engagement of Leaders in active Agile\nTransformation. It\u2019s gratifying to see how this in turn is influencing the\nbehaviour changes at the Team level. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Glad it\u2019s working. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Vishu<\/a><\/p>\n","post_title":"Agile Leadership Canvas - Cultivating Agile Mindset and Culture","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"agile-leadership-canvas-cultivating-agile-mindset-and-culture","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13556","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":13054,"post_author":"33","post_date":"2019-06-16 17:37:07","post_date_gmt":"2019-06-16 12:07:07","post_content":"\n In one of our Customer engagements, the organization is transitioning to Spotify kind of Agile approach. In this context the role of Delivery\/People Managers is changing to Chapter Leads. They form a matrix structure with Squad Leads. Their role is changing from Delivery ownership to Capability\/Competence enablement role. How to help them to transition to the new role smoothly?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Suggested Solution<\/strong> Whys of Agile<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n They also need to understand the\nWhys of Agile \u2013 the rationale behind Agile practices & principles. For\nexample, why Scrum Master role is very important, why they should not compare\nVelocity across Teams etc. Without such understanding, they might make\nanti-agile choices\/decisions based on past traditional thinking and drive the\nsame old behaviours in the Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Emotional Intelligence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Cornerstones of Agile Culture are\nFacilitative Leadership, Self-Organization and Collaboration<\/strong> across\ndifferent Functions & Units. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Foundation for all such behaviour\nis Emotional Intelligence (EQ), which is the bedrock of Leadership.\nSelf-Awareness, Self-Regulation, Self-Motivation, Empathy & Social Skills\nare the five dimensions\/tenets of Emotional Intelligence. Self-Awareness is\ncentral to higher EQ, followed by Self-Regulation, Motivation, Empathy and\nSocial Skills. Typically, our Education Systems and Corporate Performance\nManagement Systems being more IQ oriented, higher EQ people tend to get filtered\nout of the system. Additional effort & focus is needed to enhance\/develop\nEQ, in Leaders as well as in Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Mindful Leadership<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n EQ can not be developed just by training\npeople, as it\u2019s not an intellectual exercise \u2013 it involves behaviour changes.\nIt has been found through research (Google-Stanford research through \u2018Search\nInside Yourself\u2019 program is an example), that Mindfulness practices are the\npractical way to develop\/enhance EQ, as they bring about transformation in\nbrain, nervous system & endocrine system, which impact the thinking,\nemotions, moods & behaviours. <\/p>\n\n\n\n As we take Leadership teams\nthrough experiential workshops on Agile Leadership Canvas and follow up with\ncoaching, we are witnessing significant engagement of Leaders in active Agile\nTransformation. It\u2019s gratifying to see how this in turn is influencing the\nbehaviour changes at the Team level. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Glad it\u2019s working. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Vishu<\/a><\/p>\n","post_title":"Agile Leadership Canvas - Cultivating Agile Mindset and Culture","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"agile-leadership-canvas-cultivating-agile-mindset-and-culture","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13556","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":13054,"post_author":"33","post_date":"2019-06-16 17:37:07","post_date_gmt":"2019-06-16 12:07:07","post_content":"\n In one of our Customer engagements, the organization is transitioning to Spotify kind of Agile approach. In this context the role of Delivery\/People Managers is changing to Chapter Leads. They form a matrix structure with Squad Leads. Their role is changing from Delivery ownership to Capability\/Competence enablement role. How to help them to transition to the new role smoothly?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Suggested Solution<\/strong> In Enterprise Agile Transformation,\n50% of the change required is at Managers\/Leaders level \u2013 there is a lot to\nunlearn & relearn from traditional Industrial Era Management Principles\n& Leadership styles to Knowledge\nEra principles<\/a>. Leaders need to understand the fundamental characteristics\nof Knowledge Workers, as software really happens in people\u2019s mind \u2013 not in one\nmind, but in collective minds of teams. There are 5 key paradigm shifts from\nIndustrial Era to Knowledge Era that Leaders need to internalize:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Whys of Agile<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n They also need to understand the\nWhys of Agile \u2013 the rationale behind Agile practices & principles. For\nexample, why Scrum Master role is very important, why they should not compare\nVelocity across Teams etc. Without such understanding, they might make\nanti-agile choices\/decisions based on past traditional thinking and drive the\nsame old behaviours in the Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Emotional Intelligence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Cornerstones of Agile Culture are\nFacilitative Leadership, Self-Organization and Collaboration<\/strong> across\ndifferent Functions & Units. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Foundation for all such behaviour\nis Emotional Intelligence (EQ), which is the bedrock of Leadership.\nSelf-Awareness, Self-Regulation, Self-Motivation, Empathy & Social Skills\nare the five dimensions\/tenets of Emotional Intelligence. Self-Awareness is\ncentral to higher EQ, followed by Self-Regulation, Motivation, Empathy and\nSocial Skills. Typically, our Education Systems and Corporate Performance\nManagement Systems being more IQ oriented, higher EQ people tend to get filtered\nout of the system. Additional effort & focus is needed to enhance\/develop\nEQ, in Leaders as well as in Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Mindful Leadership<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n EQ can not be developed just by training\npeople, as it\u2019s not an intellectual exercise \u2013 it involves behaviour changes.\nIt has been found through research (Google-Stanford research through \u2018Search\nInside Yourself\u2019 program is an example), that Mindfulness practices are the\npractical way to develop\/enhance EQ, as they bring about transformation in\nbrain, nervous system & endocrine system, which impact the thinking,\nemotions, moods & behaviours. <\/p>\n\n\n\n As we take Leadership teams\nthrough experiential workshops on Agile Leadership Canvas and follow up with\ncoaching, we are witnessing significant engagement of Leaders in active Agile\nTransformation. It\u2019s gratifying to see how this in turn is influencing the\nbehaviour changes at the Team level. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Glad it\u2019s working. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Vishu<\/a><\/p>\n","post_title":"Agile Leadership Canvas - Cultivating Agile Mindset and Culture","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"agile-leadership-canvas-cultivating-agile-mindset-and-culture","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13556","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":13054,"post_author":"33","post_date":"2019-06-16 17:37:07","post_date_gmt":"2019-06-16 12:07:07","post_content":"\n In one of our Customer engagements, the organization is transitioning to Spotify kind of Agile approach. In this context the role of Delivery\/People Managers is changing to Chapter Leads. They form a matrix structure with Squad Leads. Their role is changing from Delivery ownership to Capability\/Competence enablement role. How to help them to transition to the new role smoothly?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Suggested Solution<\/strong> Knowledge Era Paradigms<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n In Enterprise Agile Transformation,\n50% of the change required is at Managers\/Leaders level \u2013 there is a lot to\nunlearn & relearn from traditional Industrial Era Management Principles\n& Leadership styles to Knowledge\nEra principles<\/a>. Leaders need to understand the fundamental characteristics\nof Knowledge Workers, as software really happens in people\u2019s mind \u2013 not in one\nmind, but in collective minds of teams. There are 5 key paradigm shifts from\nIndustrial Era to Knowledge Era that Leaders need to internalize:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Whys of Agile<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n They also need to understand the\nWhys of Agile \u2013 the rationale behind Agile practices & principles. For\nexample, why Scrum Master role is very important, why they should not compare\nVelocity across Teams etc. Without such understanding, they might make\nanti-agile choices\/decisions based on past traditional thinking and drive the\nsame old behaviours in the Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Emotional Intelligence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Cornerstones of Agile Culture are\nFacilitative Leadership, Self-Organization and Collaboration<\/strong> across\ndifferent Functions & Units. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Foundation for all such behaviour\nis Emotional Intelligence (EQ), which is the bedrock of Leadership.\nSelf-Awareness, Self-Regulation, Self-Motivation, Empathy & Social Skills\nare the five dimensions\/tenets of Emotional Intelligence. Self-Awareness is\ncentral to higher EQ, followed by Self-Regulation, Motivation, Empathy and\nSocial Skills. Typically, our Education Systems and Corporate Performance\nManagement Systems being more IQ oriented, higher EQ people tend to get filtered\nout of the system. Additional effort & focus is needed to enhance\/develop\nEQ, in Leaders as well as in Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Mindful Leadership<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n EQ can not be developed just by training\npeople, as it\u2019s not an intellectual exercise \u2013 it involves behaviour changes.\nIt has been found through research (Google-Stanford research through \u2018Search\nInside Yourself\u2019 program is an example), that Mindfulness practices are the\npractical way to develop\/enhance EQ, as they bring about transformation in\nbrain, nervous system & endocrine system, which impact the thinking,\nemotions, moods & behaviours. <\/p>\n\n\n\n As we take Leadership teams\nthrough experiential workshops on Agile Leadership Canvas and follow up with\ncoaching, we are witnessing significant engagement of Leaders in active Agile\nTransformation. It\u2019s gratifying to see how this in turn is influencing the\nbehaviour changes at the Team level. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Glad it\u2019s working. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Vishu<\/a><\/p>\n","post_title":"Agile Leadership Canvas - Cultivating Agile Mindset and Culture","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"agile-leadership-canvas-cultivating-agile-mindset-and-culture","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13556","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":13054,"post_author":"33","post_date":"2019-06-16 17:37:07","post_date_gmt":"2019-06-16 12:07:07","post_content":"\n In one of our Customer engagements, the organization is transitioning to Spotify kind of Agile approach. In this context the role of Delivery\/People Managers is changing to Chapter Leads. They form a matrix structure with Squad Leads. Their role is changing from Delivery ownership to Capability\/Competence enablement role. How to help them to transition to the new role smoothly?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Suggested Solution<\/strong> Bottom of the Agile iceberg is\nLeadership-led as cultivating Agile mindset & culture happens through certain\nrole-modelling. But in most of our Agile Transformation engagements we notice\nthat Leaders think that Agile is only about Teams and they want us to fix the\nTeams. They only focus on the top of the iceberg. They keep changing the models\nlike Scrum to SAFe to Spotify to Lean and so on. It becomes only changing the\nnames, as the bottom of the iceberg is not impacted \u2013 Scrum team becomes Squad,\nRelease Planning becomes PI planning or Big Room planning etc. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Knowledge Era Paradigms<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n In Enterprise Agile Transformation,\n50% of the change required is at Managers\/Leaders level \u2013 there is a lot to\nunlearn & relearn from traditional Industrial Era Management Principles\n& Leadership styles to Knowledge\nEra principles<\/a>. Leaders need to understand the fundamental characteristics\nof Knowledge Workers, as software really happens in people\u2019s mind \u2013 not in one\nmind, but in collective minds of teams. There are 5 key paradigm shifts from\nIndustrial Era to Knowledge Era that Leaders need to internalize:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Whys of Agile<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n They also need to understand the\nWhys of Agile \u2013 the rationale behind Agile practices & principles. For\nexample, why Scrum Master role is very important, why they should not compare\nVelocity across Teams etc. Without such understanding, they might make\nanti-agile choices\/decisions based on past traditional thinking and drive the\nsame old behaviours in the Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Emotional Intelligence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Cornerstones of Agile Culture are\nFacilitative Leadership, Self-Organization and Collaboration<\/strong> across\ndifferent Functions & Units. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Foundation for all such behaviour\nis Emotional Intelligence (EQ), which is the bedrock of Leadership.\nSelf-Awareness, Self-Regulation, Self-Motivation, Empathy & Social Skills\nare the five dimensions\/tenets of Emotional Intelligence. Self-Awareness is\ncentral to higher EQ, followed by Self-Regulation, Motivation, Empathy and\nSocial Skills. Typically, our Education Systems and Corporate Performance\nManagement Systems being more IQ oriented, higher EQ people tend to get filtered\nout of the system. Additional effort & focus is needed to enhance\/develop\nEQ, in Leaders as well as in Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Mindful Leadership<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n EQ can not be developed just by training\npeople, as it\u2019s not an intellectual exercise \u2013 it involves behaviour changes.\nIt has been found through research (Google-Stanford research through \u2018Search\nInside Yourself\u2019 program is an example), that Mindfulness practices are the\npractical way to develop\/enhance EQ, as they bring about transformation in\nbrain, nervous system & endocrine system, which impact the thinking,\nemotions, moods & behaviours. <\/p>\n\n\n\n As we take Leadership teams\nthrough experiential workshops on Agile Leadership Canvas and follow up with\ncoaching, we are witnessing significant engagement of Leaders in active Agile\nTransformation. It\u2019s gratifying to see how this in turn is influencing the\nbehaviour changes at the Team level. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Glad it\u2019s working. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Vishu<\/a><\/p>\n","post_title":"Agile Leadership Canvas - Cultivating Agile Mindset and Culture","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"agile-leadership-canvas-cultivating-agile-mindset-and-culture","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13556","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":13054,"post_author":"33","post_date":"2019-06-16 17:37:07","post_date_gmt":"2019-06-16 12:07:07","post_content":"\n In one of our Customer engagements, the organization is transitioning to Spotify kind of Agile approach. In this context the role of Delivery\/People Managers is changing to Chapter Leads. They form a matrix structure with Squad Leads. Their role is changing from Delivery ownership to Capability\/Competence enablement role. How to help them to transition to the new role smoothly?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Suggested Solution<\/strong> In a similar way, what makes\nAgile successful is, more than the visible parts of Agile, the not so visible\nparts of the Agile as represented in the Agile Leadership Canvas. Top of the\nAgile iceberg is about the Processes, Tools, Ceremonies, Artefacts, Metrics\netc. Bottom of the Agile iceberg is all about the Mindset & Culture aspects\nlike Values, Principles, Motivation, Collaboration and so on. Top of the\niceberg is about DOING Agile and the bottom is about BEING Agile. Top is more\nIQ oriented \u2013 Information, knowledge aspects, which people can be trained on.\nWhereas the bottom is EQ oriented \u2013 it\u2019s about Mindset, behaviour aspects \u2013\npeople need to be coached for this change. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Bottom of the Agile iceberg is\nLeadership-led as cultivating Agile mindset & culture happens through certain\nrole-modelling. But in most of our Agile Transformation engagements we notice\nthat Leaders think that Agile is only about Teams and they want us to fix the\nTeams. They only focus on the top of the iceberg. They keep changing the models\nlike Scrum to SAFe to Spotify to Lean and so on. It becomes only changing the\nnames, as the bottom of the iceberg is not impacted \u2013 Scrum team becomes Squad,\nRelease Planning becomes PI planning or Big Room planning etc. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Knowledge Era Paradigms<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n In Enterprise Agile Transformation,\n50% of the change required is at Managers\/Leaders level \u2013 there is a lot to\nunlearn & relearn from traditional Industrial Era Management Principles\n& Leadership styles to Knowledge\nEra principles<\/a>. Leaders need to understand the fundamental characteristics\nof Knowledge Workers, as software really happens in people\u2019s mind \u2013 not in one\nmind, but in collective minds of teams. There are 5 key paradigm shifts from\nIndustrial Era to Knowledge Era that Leaders need to internalize:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Whys of Agile<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n They also need to understand the\nWhys of Agile \u2013 the rationale behind Agile practices & principles. For\nexample, why Scrum Master role is very important, why they should not compare\nVelocity across Teams etc. Without such understanding, they might make\nanti-agile choices\/decisions based on past traditional thinking and drive the\nsame old behaviours in the Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Emotional Intelligence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Cornerstones of Agile Culture are\nFacilitative Leadership, Self-Organization and Collaboration<\/strong> across\ndifferent Functions & Units. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Foundation for all such behaviour\nis Emotional Intelligence (EQ), which is the bedrock of Leadership.\nSelf-Awareness, Self-Regulation, Self-Motivation, Empathy & Social Skills\nare the five dimensions\/tenets of Emotional Intelligence. Self-Awareness is\ncentral to higher EQ, followed by Self-Regulation, Motivation, Empathy and\nSocial Skills. Typically, our Education Systems and Corporate Performance\nManagement Systems being more IQ oriented, higher EQ people tend to get filtered\nout of the system. Additional effort & focus is needed to enhance\/develop\nEQ, in Leaders as well as in Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Mindful Leadership<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n EQ can not be developed just by training\npeople, as it\u2019s not an intellectual exercise \u2013 it involves behaviour changes.\nIt has been found through research (Google-Stanford research through \u2018Search\nInside Yourself\u2019 program is an example), that Mindfulness practices are the\npractical way to develop\/enhance EQ, as they bring about transformation in\nbrain, nervous system & endocrine system, which impact the thinking,\nemotions, moods & behaviours. <\/p>\n\n\n\n As we take Leadership teams\nthrough experiential workshops on Agile Leadership Canvas and follow up with\ncoaching, we are witnessing significant engagement of Leaders in active Agile\nTransformation. It\u2019s gratifying to see how this in turn is influencing the\nbehaviour changes at the Team level. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Glad it\u2019s working. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Vishu<\/a><\/p>\n","post_title":"Agile Leadership Canvas - Cultivating Agile Mindset and Culture","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"agile-leadership-canvas-cultivating-agile-mindset-and-culture","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13556","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":13054,"post_author":"33","post_date":"2019-06-16 17:37:07","post_date_gmt":"2019-06-16 12:07:07","post_content":"\n In one of our Customer engagements, the organization is transitioning to Spotify kind of Agile approach. In this context the role of Delivery\/People Managers is changing to Chapter Leads. They form a matrix structure with Squad Leads. Their role is changing from Delivery ownership to Capability\/Competence enablement role. How to help them to transition to the new role smoothly?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Suggested Solution<\/strong> We know that about 10% of the\niceberg is visible and 90% is submerged in the water and not so visible. What\nmoves the iceberg is not the visible wind on the surface, but invisible\nunder-currents in the water. <\/p>\n\n\n\n In a similar way, what makes\nAgile successful is, more than the visible parts of Agile, the not so visible\nparts of the Agile as represented in the Agile Leadership Canvas. Top of the\nAgile iceberg is about the Processes, Tools, Ceremonies, Artefacts, Metrics\netc. Bottom of the Agile iceberg is all about the Mindset & Culture aspects\nlike Values, Principles, Motivation, Collaboration and so on. Top of the\niceberg is about DOING Agile and the bottom is about BEING Agile. Top is more\nIQ oriented \u2013 Information, knowledge aspects, which people can be trained on.\nWhereas the bottom is EQ oriented \u2013 it\u2019s about Mindset, behaviour aspects \u2013\npeople need to be coached for this change. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Bottom of the Agile iceberg is\nLeadership-led as cultivating Agile mindset & culture happens through certain\nrole-modelling. But in most of our Agile Transformation engagements we notice\nthat Leaders think that Agile is only about Teams and they want us to fix the\nTeams. They only focus on the top of the iceberg. They keep changing the models\nlike Scrum to SAFe to Spotify to Lean and so on. It becomes only changing the\nnames, as the bottom of the iceberg is not impacted \u2013 Scrum team becomes Squad,\nRelease Planning becomes PI planning or Big Room planning etc. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Knowledge Era Paradigms<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n In Enterprise Agile Transformation,\n50% of the change required is at Managers\/Leaders level \u2013 there is a lot to\nunlearn & relearn from traditional Industrial Era Management Principles\n& Leadership styles to Knowledge\nEra principles<\/a>. Leaders need to understand the fundamental characteristics\nof Knowledge Workers, as software really happens in people\u2019s mind \u2013 not in one\nmind, but in collective minds of teams. There are 5 key paradigm shifts from\nIndustrial Era to Knowledge Era that Leaders need to internalize:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Whys of Agile<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n They also need to understand the\nWhys of Agile \u2013 the rationale behind Agile practices & principles. For\nexample, why Scrum Master role is very important, why they should not compare\nVelocity across Teams etc. Without such understanding, they might make\nanti-agile choices\/decisions based on past traditional thinking and drive the\nsame old behaviours in the Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Emotional Intelligence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Cornerstones of Agile Culture are\nFacilitative Leadership, Self-Organization and Collaboration<\/strong> across\ndifferent Functions & Units. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Foundation for all such behaviour\nis Emotional Intelligence (EQ), which is the bedrock of Leadership.\nSelf-Awareness, Self-Regulation, Self-Motivation, Empathy & Social Skills\nare the five dimensions\/tenets of Emotional Intelligence. Self-Awareness is\ncentral to higher EQ, followed by Self-Regulation, Motivation, Empathy and\nSocial Skills. Typically, our Education Systems and Corporate Performance\nManagement Systems being more IQ oriented, higher EQ people tend to get filtered\nout of the system. Additional effort & focus is needed to enhance\/develop\nEQ, in Leaders as well as in Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Mindful Leadership<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n EQ can not be developed just by training\npeople, as it\u2019s not an intellectual exercise \u2013 it involves behaviour changes.\nIt has been found through research (Google-Stanford research through \u2018Search\nInside Yourself\u2019 program is an example), that Mindfulness practices are the\npractical way to develop\/enhance EQ, as they bring about transformation in\nbrain, nervous system & endocrine system, which impact the thinking,\nemotions, moods & behaviours. <\/p>\n\n\n\n As we take Leadership teams\nthrough experiential workshops on Agile Leadership Canvas and follow up with\ncoaching, we are witnessing significant engagement of Leaders in active Agile\nTransformation. It\u2019s gratifying to see how this in turn is influencing the\nbehaviour changes at the Team level. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Glad it\u2019s working. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Vishu<\/a><\/p>\n","post_title":"Agile Leadership Canvas - Cultivating Agile Mindset and Culture","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"agile-leadership-canvas-cultivating-agile-mindset-and-culture","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13556","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":13054,"post_author":"33","post_date":"2019-06-16 17:37:07","post_date_gmt":"2019-06-16 12:07:07","post_content":"\n In one of our Customer engagements, the organization is transitioning to Spotify kind of Agile approach. In this context the role of Delivery\/People Managers is changing to Chapter Leads. They form a matrix structure with Squad Leads. Their role is changing from Delivery ownership to Capability\/Competence enablement role. How to help them to transition to the new role smoothly?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Suggested Solution<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n We know that about 10% of the\niceberg is visible and 90% is submerged in the water and not so visible. What\nmoves the iceberg is not the visible wind on the surface, but invisible\nunder-currents in the water. <\/p>\n\n\n\n In a similar way, what makes\nAgile successful is, more than the visible parts of Agile, the not so visible\nparts of the Agile as represented in the Agile Leadership Canvas. Top of the\nAgile iceberg is about the Processes, Tools, Ceremonies, Artefacts, Metrics\netc. Bottom of the Agile iceberg is all about the Mindset & Culture aspects\nlike Values, Principles, Motivation, Collaboration and so on. Top of the\niceberg is about DOING Agile and the bottom is about BEING Agile. Top is more\nIQ oriented \u2013 Information, knowledge aspects, which people can be trained on.\nWhereas the bottom is EQ oriented \u2013 it\u2019s about Mindset, behaviour aspects \u2013\npeople need to be coached for this change. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Bottom of the Agile iceberg is\nLeadership-led as cultivating Agile mindset & culture happens through certain\nrole-modelling. But in most of our Agile Transformation engagements we notice\nthat Leaders think that Agile is only about Teams and they want us to fix the\nTeams. They only focus on the top of the iceberg. They keep changing the models\nlike Scrum to SAFe to Spotify to Lean and so on. It becomes only changing the\nnames, as the bottom of the iceberg is not impacted \u2013 Scrum team becomes Squad,\nRelease Planning becomes PI planning or Big Room planning etc. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Knowledge Era Paradigms<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n In Enterprise Agile Transformation,\n50% of the change required is at Managers\/Leaders level \u2013 there is a lot to\nunlearn & relearn from traditional Industrial Era Management Principles\n& Leadership styles to Knowledge\nEra principles<\/a>. Leaders need to understand the fundamental characteristics\nof Knowledge Workers, as software really happens in people\u2019s mind \u2013 not in one\nmind, but in collective minds of teams. There are 5 key paradigm shifts from\nIndustrial Era to Knowledge Era that Leaders need to internalize:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Whys of Agile<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n They also need to understand the\nWhys of Agile \u2013 the rationale behind Agile practices & principles. For\nexample, why Scrum Master role is very important, why they should not compare\nVelocity across Teams etc. Without such understanding, they might make\nanti-agile choices\/decisions based on past traditional thinking and drive the\nsame old behaviours in the Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Emotional Intelligence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Cornerstones of Agile Culture are\nFacilitative Leadership, Self-Organization and Collaboration<\/strong> across\ndifferent Functions & Units. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Foundation for all such behaviour\nis Emotional Intelligence (EQ), which is the bedrock of Leadership.\nSelf-Awareness, Self-Regulation, Self-Motivation, Empathy & Social Skills\nare the five dimensions\/tenets of Emotional Intelligence. Self-Awareness is\ncentral to higher EQ, followed by Self-Regulation, Motivation, Empathy and\nSocial Skills. Typically, our Education Systems and Corporate Performance\nManagement Systems being more IQ oriented, higher EQ people tend to get filtered\nout of the system. Additional effort & focus is needed to enhance\/develop\nEQ, in Leaders as well as in Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Mindful Leadership<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n EQ can not be developed just by training\npeople, as it\u2019s not an intellectual exercise \u2013 it involves behaviour changes.\nIt has been found through research (Google-Stanford research through \u2018Search\nInside Yourself\u2019 program is an example), that Mindfulness practices are the\npractical way to develop\/enhance EQ, as they bring about transformation in\nbrain, nervous system & endocrine system, which impact the thinking,\nemotions, moods & behaviours. <\/p>\n\n\n\n As we take Leadership teams\nthrough experiential workshops on Agile Leadership Canvas and follow up with\ncoaching, we are witnessing significant engagement of Leaders in active Agile\nTransformation. It\u2019s gratifying to see how this in turn is influencing the\nbehaviour changes at the Team level. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Glad it\u2019s working. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Vishu<\/a><\/p>\n","post_title":"Agile Leadership Canvas - Cultivating Agile Mindset and Culture","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"agile-leadership-canvas-cultivating-agile-mindset-and-culture","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13556","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":13054,"post_author":"33","post_date":"2019-06-16 17:37:07","post_date_gmt":"2019-06-16 12:07:07","post_content":"\n In one of our Customer engagements, the organization is transitioning to Spotify kind of Agile approach. In this context the role of Delivery\/People Managers is changing to Chapter Leads. They form a matrix structure with Squad Leads. Their role is changing from Delivery ownership to Capability\/Competence enablement role. How to help them to transition to the new role smoothly?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Suggested Solution<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n We know that about 10% of the\niceberg is visible and 90% is submerged in the water and not so visible. What\nmoves the iceberg is not the visible wind on the surface, but invisible\nunder-currents in the water. <\/p>\n\n\n\n In a similar way, what makes\nAgile successful is, more than the visible parts of Agile, the not so visible\nparts of the Agile as represented in the Agile Leadership Canvas. Top of the\nAgile iceberg is about the Processes, Tools, Ceremonies, Artefacts, Metrics\netc. Bottom of the Agile iceberg is all about the Mindset & Culture aspects\nlike Values, Principles, Motivation, Collaboration and so on. Top of the\niceberg is about DOING Agile and the bottom is about BEING Agile. Top is more\nIQ oriented \u2013 Information, knowledge aspects, which people can be trained on.\nWhereas the bottom is EQ oriented \u2013 it\u2019s about Mindset, behaviour aspects \u2013\npeople need to be coached for this change. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Bottom of the Agile iceberg is\nLeadership-led as cultivating Agile mindset & culture happens through certain\nrole-modelling. But in most of our Agile Transformation engagements we notice\nthat Leaders think that Agile is only about Teams and they want us to fix the\nTeams. They only focus on the top of the iceberg. They keep changing the models\nlike Scrum to SAFe to Spotify to Lean and so on. It becomes only changing the\nnames, as the bottom of the iceberg is not impacted \u2013 Scrum team becomes Squad,\nRelease Planning becomes PI planning or Big Room planning etc. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Knowledge Era Paradigms<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n In Enterprise Agile Transformation,\n50% of the change required is at Managers\/Leaders level \u2013 there is a lot to\nunlearn & relearn from traditional Industrial Era Management Principles\n& Leadership styles to Knowledge\nEra principles<\/a>. Leaders need to understand the fundamental characteristics\nof Knowledge Workers, as software really happens in people\u2019s mind \u2013 not in one\nmind, but in collective minds of teams. There are 5 key paradigm shifts from\nIndustrial Era to Knowledge Era that Leaders need to internalize:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Whys of Agile<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n They also need to understand the\nWhys of Agile \u2013 the rationale behind Agile practices & principles. For\nexample, why Scrum Master role is very important, why they should not compare\nVelocity across Teams etc. Without such understanding, they might make\nanti-agile choices\/decisions based on past traditional thinking and drive the\nsame old behaviours in the Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Emotional Intelligence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Cornerstones of Agile Culture are\nFacilitative Leadership, Self-Organization and Collaboration<\/strong> across\ndifferent Functions & Units. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Foundation for all such behaviour\nis Emotional Intelligence (EQ), which is the bedrock of Leadership.\nSelf-Awareness, Self-Regulation, Self-Motivation, Empathy & Social Skills\nare the five dimensions\/tenets of Emotional Intelligence. Self-Awareness is\ncentral to higher EQ, followed by Self-Regulation, Motivation, Empathy and\nSocial Skills. Typically, our Education Systems and Corporate Performance\nManagement Systems being more IQ oriented, higher EQ people tend to get filtered\nout of the system. Additional effort & focus is needed to enhance\/develop\nEQ, in Leaders as well as in Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Mindful Leadership<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n EQ can not be developed just by training\npeople, as it\u2019s not an intellectual exercise \u2013 it involves behaviour changes.\nIt has been found through research (Google-Stanford research through \u2018Search\nInside Yourself\u2019 program is an example), that Mindfulness practices are the\npractical way to develop\/enhance EQ, as they bring about transformation in\nbrain, nervous system & endocrine system, which impact the thinking,\nemotions, moods & behaviours. <\/p>\n\n\n\n As we take Leadership teams\nthrough experiential workshops on Agile Leadership Canvas and follow up with\ncoaching, we are witnessing significant engagement of Leaders in active Agile\nTransformation. It\u2019s gratifying to see how this in turn is influencing the\nbehaviour changes at the Team level. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Glad it\u2019s working. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Vishu<\/a><\/p>\n","post_title":"Agile Leadership Canvas - Cultivating Agile Mindset and Culture","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"agile-leadership-canvas-cultivating-agile-mindset-and-culture","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13556","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":13054,"post_author":"33","post_date":"2019-06-16 17:37:07","post_date_gmt":"2019-06-16 12:07:07","post_content":"\n In one of our Customer engagements, the organization is transitioning to Spotify kind of Agile approach. In this context the role of Delivery\/People Managers is changing to Chapter Leads. They form a matrix structure with Squad Leads. Their role is changing from Delivery ownership to Capability\/Competence enablement role. How to help them to transition to the new role smoothly?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Suggested Solution<\/strong> But, how should Leaders develop such ecosystem? Based on our experiences in several Enterprise Agile Transformations, we have created and deployed Agile Leadership Canvas<\/strong> for Leadership Coaching. <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n We know that about 10% of the\niceberg is visible and 90% is submerged in the water and not so visible. What\nmoves the iceberg is not the visible wind on the surface, but invisible\nunder-currents in the water. <\/p>\n\n\n\n In a similar way, what makes\nAgile successful is, more than the visible parts of Agile, the not so visible\nparts of the Agile as represented in the Agile Leadership Canvas. Top of the\nAgile iceberg is about the Processes, Tools, Ceremonies, Artefacts, Metrics\netc. Bottom of the Agile iceberg is all about the Mindset & Culture aspects\nlike Values, Principles, Motivation, Collaboration and so on. Top of the\niceberg is about DOING Agile and the bottom is about BEING Agile. Top is more\nIQ oriented \u2013 Information, knowledge aspects, which people can be trained on.\nWhereas the bottom is EQ oriented \u2013 it\u2019s about Mindset, behaviour aspects \u2013\npeople need to be coached for this change. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Bottom of the Agile iceberg is\nLeadership-led as cultivating Agile mindset & culture happens through certain\nrole-modelling. But in most of our Agile Transformation engagements we notice\nthat Leaders think that Agile is only about Teams and they want us to fix the\nTeams. They only focus on the top of the iceberg. They keep changing the models\nlike Scrum to SAFe to Spotify to Lean and so on. It becomes only changing the\nnames, as the bottom of the iceberg is not impacted \u2013 Scrum team becomes Squad,\nRelease Planning becomes PI planning or Big Room planning etc. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Knowledge Era Paradigms<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n In Enterprise Agile Transformation,\n50% of the change required is at Managers\/Leaders level \u2013 there is a lot to\nunlearn & relearn from traditional Industrial Era Management Principles\n& Leadership styles to Knowledge\nEra principles<\/a>. Leaders need to understand the fundamental characteristics\nof Knowledge Workers, as software really happens in people\u2019s mind \u2013 not in one\nmind, but in collective minds of teams. There are 5 key paradigm shifts from\nIndustrial Era to Knowledge Era that Leaders need to internalize:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Whys of Agile<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n They also need to understand the\nWhys of Agile \u2013 the rationale behind Agile practices & principles. For\nexample, why Scrum Master role is very important, why they should not compare\nVelocity across Teams etc. Without such understanding, they might make\nanti-agile choices\/decisions based on past traditional thinking and drive the\nsame old behaviours in the Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Emotional Intelligence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Cornerstones of Agile Culture are\nFacilitative Leadership, Self-Organization and Collaboration<\/strong> across\ndifferent Functions & Units. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Foundation for all such behaviour\nis Emotional Intelligence (EQ), which is the bedrock of Leadership.\nSelf-Awareness, Self-Regulation, Self-Motivation, Empathy & Social Skills\nare the five dimensions\/tenets of Emotional Intelligence. Self-Awareness is\ncentral to higher EQ, followed by Self-Regulation, Motivation, Empathy and\nSocial Skills. Typically, our Education Systems and Corporate Performance\nManagement Systems being more IQ oriented, higher EQ people tend to get filtered\nout of the system. Additional effort & focus is needed to enhance\/develop\nEQ, in Leaders as well as in Teams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Mindful Leadership<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n EQ can not be developed just by training\npeople, as it\u2019s not an intellectual exercise \u2013 it involves behaviour changes.\nIt has been found through research (Google-Stanford research through \u2018Search\nInside Yourself\u2019 program is an example), that Mindfulness practices are the\npractical way to develop\/enhance EQ, as they bring about transformation in\nbrain, nervous system & endocrine system, which impact the thinking,\nemotions, moods & behaviours. <\/p>\n\n\n\n As we take Leadership teams\nthrough experiential workshops on Agile Leadership Canvas and follow up with\ncoaching, we are witnessing significant engagement of Leaders in active Agile\nTransformation. It\u2019s gratifying to see how this in turn is influencing the\nbehaviour changes at the Team level. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Glad it\u2019s working. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Vishu<\/a><\/p>\n","post_title":"Agile Leadership Canvas - Cultivating Agile Mindset and Culture","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"agile-leadership-canvas-cultivating-agile-mindset-and-culture","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:19:53","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13556","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":13054,"post_author":"33","post_date":"2019-06-16 17:37:07","post_date_gmt":"2019-06-16 12:07:07","post_content":"\n In one of our Customer engagements, the organization is transitioning to Spotify kind of Agile approach. In this context the role of Delivery\/People Managers is changing to Chapter Leads. They form a matrix structure with Squad Leads. Their role is changing from Delivery ownership to Capability\/Competence enablement role. How to help them to transition to the new role smoothly?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Suggested Solution<\/strong> Leaders\u2019 role is like that of\nfarmers. They need to create an environment where people thrive and excel in\ndelivering value. It\u2019s about creating an ecosystem of right mindset &\nculture. <\/p>\n\n\n\n But, how should Leaders develop such ecosystem? Based on our experiences in several Enterprise Agile Transformations, we have created and deployed Agile Leadership Canvas<\/strong> for Leadership Coaching. <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n We know that about 10% of the\niceberg is visible and 90% is submerged in the water and not so visible. What\nmoves the iceberg is not the visible wind on the surface, but invisible\nunder-currents in the water. <\/p>\n\n\n\n In a similar way, what makes\nAgile successful is, more than the visible parts of Agile, the not so visible\nparts of the Agile as represented in the Agile Leadership Canvas. Top of the\nAgile iceberg is about the Processes, Tools, Ceremonies, Artefacts, Metrics\netc. Bottom of the Agile iceberg is all about the Mindset & Culture aspects\nlike Values, Principles, Motivation, Collaboration and so on. Top of the\niceberg is about DOING Agile and the bottom is about BEING Agile. Top is more\nIQ oriented \u2013 Information, knowledge aspects, which people can be trained on.\nWhereas the bottom is EQ oriented \u2013 it\u2019s about Mindset, behaviour aspects \u2013\npeople need to be coached for this change. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Bottom of the Agile iceberg is\nLeadership-led as cultivating Agile mindset & culture happens through certain\nrole-modelling. But in most of our Agile Transformation engagements we notice\nthat Leaders think that Agile is only about Teams and they want us to fix the\nTeams. They only focus on the top of the iceberg. They keep changing the models\nlike Scrum to SAFe to Spotify to Lean and so on. It becomes only changing the\nnames, as the bottom of the iceberg is not impacted \u2013 Scrum team becomes Squad,\nRelease Planning becomes PI planning or Big Room planning etc. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
In their new role as Chapter Leads, they will have to unlearn some of the past approaches and learn a few new things:
\u2013 They need to let go of the past control-oriented ownership. And need to let go of the hierarchical mindset, as the new structure brings a matrix-oriented way of engaging.
\u2013 They need to embrace more facilitative and collaborative approaches as they need to engage with different components of the flat network-oriented organization.
\u2013 They need to learn to work with shared accountability and responsibilities that come in the matrix structure, which require more of networking, relationship-building and influencing skills. They need to be more self-organizing, taking ownership and reaching out to different parts of the matrix organization as needed.
\u2013 Trying to define the roles very clearly in a matrix structure will lead to creating silos as people will tend to go by the role specification; but this is an antipattern of matrix structure which is designed for breaking down silos. Hence the roles will have certain fuzziness and overlap which the Chapter Leads need to learn to work with\/leverage.
\u2013 They need to develop more servant leadership qualities to develop people capabilities & competencies.
In summary, Chapter Leads need to focus on adopting to new mindset more than the new processes.
As Sivaguru puts it, Tribes are about Purpose, Squads are about Autonomy and Chapters are about Mastery. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Chow #153 - Chapter Leads' Challenges","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"chow-153-chapter-leads-challenges","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13054","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"epic_block_11"};
\n
In their new role as Chapter Leads, they will have to unlearn some of the past approaches and learn a few new things:
\u2013 They need to let go of the past control-oriented ownership. And need to let go of the hierarchical mindset, as the new structure brings a matrix-oriented way of engaging.
\u2013 They need to embrace more facilitative and collaborative approaches as they need to engage with different components of the flat network-oriented organization.
\u2013 They need to learn to work with shared accountability and responsibilities that come in the matrix structure, which require more of networking, relationship-building and influencing skills. They need to be more self-organizing, taking ownership and reaching out to different parts of the matrix organization as needed.
\u2013 Trying to define the roles very clearly in a matrix structure will lead to creating silos as people will tend to go by the role specification; but this is an antipattern of matrix structure which is designed for breaking down silos. Hence the roles will have certain fuzziness and overlap which the Chapter Leads need to learn to work with\/leverage.
\u2013 They need to develop more servant leadership qualities to develop people capabilities & competencies.
In summary, Chapter Leads need to focus on adopting to new mindset more than the new processes.
As Sivaguru puts it, Tribes are about Purpose, Squads are about Autonomy and Chapters are about Mastery. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Chow #153 - Chapter Leads' Challenges","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"chow-153-chapter-leads-challenges","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13054","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"epic_block_11"};
\n
In their new role as Chapter Leads, they will have to unlearn some of the past approaches and learn a few new things:
\u2013 They need to let go of the past control-oriented ownership. And need to let go of the hierarchical mindset, as the new structure brings a matrix-oriented way of engaging.
\u2013 They need to embrace more facilitative and collaborative approaches as they need to engage with different components of the flat network-oriented organization.
\u2013 They need to learn to work with shared accountability and responsibilities that come in the matrix structure, which require more of networking, relationship-building and influencing skills. They need to be more self-organizing, taking ownership and reaching out to different parts of the matrix organization as needed.
\u2013 Trying to define the roles very clearly in a matrix structure will lead to creating silos as people will tend to go by the role specification; but this is an antipattern of matrix structure which is designed for breaking down silos. Hence the roles will have certain fuzziness and overlap which the Chapter Leads need to learn to work with\/leverage.
\u2013 They need to develop more servant leadership qualities to develop people capabilities & competencies.
In summary, Chapter Leads need to focus on adopting to new mindset more than the new processes.
As Sivaguru puts it, Tribes are about Purpose, Squads are about Autonomy and Chapters are about Mastery. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Chow #153 - Chapter Leads' Challenges","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"chow-153-chapter-leads-challenges","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13054","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"epic_block_11"};
\n
In their new role as Chapter Leads, they will have to unlearn some of the past approaches and learn a few new things:
\u2013 They need to let go of the past control-oriented ownership. And need to let go of the hierarchical mindset, as the new structure brings a matrix-oriented way of engaging.
\u2013 They need to embrace more facilitative and collaborative approaches as they need to engage with different components of the flat network-oriented organization.
\u2013 They need to learn to work with shared accountability and responsibilities that come in the matrix structure, which require more of networking, relationship-building and influencing skills. They need to be more self-organizing, taking ownership and reaching out to different parts of the matrix organization as needed.
\u2013 Trying to define the roles very clearly in a matrix structure will lead to creating silos as people will tend to go by the role specification; but this is an antipattern of matrix structure which is designed for breaking down silos. Hence the roles will have certain fuzziness and overlap which the Chapter Leads need to learn to work with\/leverage.
\u2013 They need to develop more servant leadership qualities to develop people capabilities & competencies.
In summary, Chapter Leads need to focus on adopting to new mindset more than the new processes.
As Sivaguru puts it, Tribes are about Purpose, Squads are about Autonomy and Chapters are about Mastery. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Chow #153 - Chapter Leads' Challenges","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"chow-153-chapter-leads-challenges","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13054","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"epic_block_11"};
\n
In their new role as Chapter Leads, they will have to unlearn some of the past approaches and learn a few new things:
\u2013 They need to let go of the past control-oriented ownership. And need to let go of the hierarchical mindset, as the new structure brings a matrix-oriented way of engaging.
\u2013 They need to embrace more facilitative and collaborative approaches as they need to engage with different components of the flat network-oriented organization.
\u2013 They need to learn to work with shared accountability and responsibilities that come in the matrix structure, which require more of networking, relationship-building and influencing skills. They need to be more self-organizing, taking ownership and reaching out to different parts of the matrix organization as needed.
\u2013 Trying to define the roles very clearly in a matrix structure will lead to creating silos as people will tend to go by the role specification; but this is an antipattern of matrix structure which is designed for breaking down silos. Hence the roles will have certain fuzziness and overlap which the Chapter Leads need to learn to work with\/leverage.
\u2013 They need to develop more servant leadership qualities to develop people capabilities & competencies.
In summary, Chapter Leads need to focus on adopting to new mindset more than the new processes.
As Sivaguru puts it, Tribes are about Purpose, Squads are about Autonomy and Chapters are about Mastery. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Chow #153 - Chapter Leads' Challenges","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"chow-153-chapter-leads-challenges","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13054","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"epic_block_11"};
\n
In their new role as Chapter Leads, they will have to unlearn some of the past approaches and learn a few new things:
\u2013 They need to let go of the past control-oriented ownership. And need to let go of the hierarchical mindset, as the new structure brings a matrix-oriented way of engaging.
\u2013 They need to embrace more facilitative and collaborative approaches as they need to engage with different components of the flat network-oriented organization.
\u2013 They need to learn to work with shared accountability and responsibilities that come in the matrix structure, which require more of networking, relationship-building and influencing skills. They need to be more self-organizing, taking ownership and reaching out to different parts of the matrix organization as needed.
\u2013 Trying to define the roles very clearly in a matrix structure will lead to creating silos as people will tend to go by the role specification; but this is an antipattern of matrix structure which is designed for breaking down silos. Hence the roles will have certain fuzziness and overlap which the Chapter Leads need to learn to work with\/leverage.
\u2013 They need to develop more servant leadership qualities to develop people capabilities & competencies.
In summary, Chapter Leads need to focus on adopting to new mindset more than the new processes.
As Sivaguru puts it, Tribes are about Purpose, Squads are about Autonomy and Chapters are about Mastery. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Chow #153 - Chapter Leads' Challenges","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"chow-153-chapter-leads-challenges","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13054","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"epic_block_11"};
\n
In their new role as Chapter Leads, they will have to unlearn some of the past approaches and learn a few new things:
\u2013 They need to let go of the past control-oriented ownership. And need to let go of the hierarchical mindset, as the new structure brings a matrix-oriented way of engaging.
\u2013 They need to embrace more facilitative and collaborative approaches as they need to engage with different components of the flat network-oriented organization.
\u2013 They need to learn to work with shared accountability and responsibilities that come in the matrix structure, which require more of networking, relationship-building and influencing skills. They need to be more self-organizing, taking ownership and reaching out to different parts of the matrix organization as needed.
\u2013 Trying to define the roles very clearly in a matrix structure will lead to creating silos as people will tend to go by the role specification; but this is an antipattern of matrix structure which is designed for breaking down silos. Hence the roles will have certain fuzziness and overlap which the Chapter Leads need to learn to work with\/leverage.
\u2013 They need to develop more servant leadership qualities to develop people capabilities & competencies.
In summary, Chapter Leads need to focus on adopting to new mindset more than the new processes.
As Sivaguru puts it, Tribes are about Purpose, Squads are about Autonomy and Chapters are about Mastery. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Chow #153 - Chapter Leads' Challenges","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"chow-153-chapter-leads-challenges","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13054","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"epic_block_11"};
\n
In their new role as Chapter Leads, they will have to unlearn some of the past approaches and learn a few new things:
\u2013 They need to let go of the past control-oriented ownership. And need to let go of the hierarchical mindset, as the new structure brings a matrix-oriented way of engaging.
\u2013 They need to embrace more facilitative and collaborative approaches as they need to engage with different components of the flat network-oriented organization.
\u2013 They need to learn to work with shared accountability and responsibilities that come in the matrix structure, which require more of networking, relationship-building and influencing skills. They need to be more self-organizing, taking ownership and reaching out to different parts of the matrix organization as needed.
\u2013 Trying to define the roles very clearly in a matrix structure will lead to creating silos as people will tend to go by the role specification; but this is an antipattern of matrix structure which is designed for breaking down silos. Hence the roles will have certain fuzziness and overlap which the Chapter Leads need to learn to work with\/leverage.
\u2013 They need to develop more servant leadership qualities to develop people capabilities & competencies.
In summary, Chapter Leads need to focus on adopting to new mindset more than the new processes.
As Sivaguru puts it, Tribes are about Purpose, Squads are about Autonomy and Chapters are about Mastery. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Chow #153 - Chapter Leads' Challenges","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"chow-153-chapter-leads-challenges","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13054","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"epic_block_11"};
\n
In their new role as Chapter Leads, they will have to unlearn some of the past approaches and learn a few new things:
\u2013 They need to let go of the past control-oriented ownership. And need to let go of the hierarchical mindset, as the new structure brings a matrix-oriented way of engaging.
\u2013 They need to embrace more facilitative and collaborative approaches as they need to engage with different components of the flat network-oriented organization.
\u2013 They need to learn to work with shared accountability and responsibilities that come in the matrix structure, which require more of networking, relationship-building and influencing skills. They need to be more self-organizing, taking ownership and reaching out to different parts of the matrix organization as needed.
\u2013 Trying to define the roles very clearly in a matrix structure will lead to creating silos as people will tend to go by the role specification; but this is an antipattern of matrix structure which is designed for breaking down silos. Hence the roles will have certain fuzziness and overlap which the Chapter Leads need to learn to work with\/leverage.
\u2013 They need to develop more servant leadership qualities to develop people capabilities & competencies.
In summary, Chapter Leads need to focus on adopting to new mindset more than the new processes.
As Sivaguru puts it, Tribes are about Purpose, Squads are about Autonomy and Chapters are about Mastery. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Chow #153 - Chapter Leads' Challenges","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"chow-153-chapter-leads-challenges","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13054","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"epic_block_11"};
\n
In their new role as Chapter Leads, they will have to unlearn some of the past approaches and learn a few new things:
\u2013 They need to let go of the past control-oriented ownership. And need to let go of the hierarchical mindset, as the new structure brings a matrix-oriented way of engaging.
\u2013 They need to embrace more facilitative and collaborative approaches as they need to engage with different components of the flat network-oriented organization.
\u2013 They need to learn to work with shared accountability and responsibilities that come in the matrix structure, which require more of networking, relationship-building and influencing skills. They need to be more self-organizing, taking ownership and reaching out to different parts of the matrix organization as needed.
\u2013 Trying to define the roles very clearly in a matrix structure will lead to creating silos as people will tend to go by the role specification; but this is an antipattern of matrix structure which is designed for breaking down silos. Hence the roles will have certain fuzziness and overlap which the Chapter Leads need to learn to work with\/leverage.
\u2013 They need to develop more servant leadership qualities to develop people capabilities & competencies.
In summary, Chapter Leads need to focus on adopting to new mindset more than the new processes.
As Sivaguru puts it, Tribes are about Purpose, Squads are about Autonomy and Chapters are about Mastery. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Chow #153 - Chapter Leads' Challenges","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"chow-153-chapter-leads-challenges","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13054","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"epic_block_11"};
\n
In their new role as Chapter Leads, they will have to unlearn some of the past approaches and learn a few new things:
\u2013 They need to let go of the past control-oriented ownership. And need to let go of the hierarchical mindset, as the new structure brings a matrix-oriented way of engaging.
\u2013 They need to embrace more facilitative and collaborative approaches as they need to engage with different components of the flat network-oriented organization.
\u2013 They need to learn to work with shared accountability and responsibilities that come in the matrix structure, which require more of networking, relationship-building and influencing skills. They need to be more self-organizing, taking ownership and reaching out to different parts of the matrix organization as needed.
\u2013 Trying to define the roles very clearly in a matrix structure will lead to creating silos as people will tend to go by the role specification; but this is an antipattern of matrix structure which is designed for breaking down silos. Hence the roles will have certain fuzziness and overlap which the Chapter Leads need to learn to work with\/leverage.
\u2013 They need to develop more servant leadership qualities to develop people capabilities & competencies.
In summary, Chapter Leads need to focus on adopting to new mindset more than the new processes.
As Sivaguru puts it, Tribes are about Purpose, Squads are about Autonomy and Chapters are about Mastery. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Chow #153 - Chapter Leads' Challenges","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"chow-153-chapter-leads-challenges","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13054","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"epic_block_11"};
\n
In their new role as Chapter Leads, they will have to unlearn some of the past approaches and learn a few new things:
\u2013 They need to let go of the past control-oriented ownership. And need to let go of the hierarchical mindset, as the new structure brings a matrix-oriented way of engaging.
\u2013 They need to embrace more facilitative and collaborative approaches as they need to engage with different components of the flat network-oriented organization.
\u2013 They need to learn to work with shared accountability and responsibilities that come in the matrix structure, which require more of networking, relationship-building and influencing skills. They need to be more self-organizing, taking ownership and reaching out to different parts of the matrix organization as needed.
\u2013 Trying to define the roles very clearly in a matrix structure will lead to creating silos as people will tend to go by the role specification; but this is an antipattern of matrix structure which is designed for breaking down silos. Hence the roles will have certain fuzziness and overlap which the Chapter Leads need to learn to work with\/leverage.
\u2013 They need to develop more servant leadership qualities to develop people capabilities & competencies.
In summary, Chapter Leads need to focus on adopting to new mindset more than the new processes.
As Sivaguru puts it, Tribes are about Purpose, Squads are about Autonomy and Chapters are about Mastery. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Chow #153 - Chapter Leads' Challenges","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"chow-153-chapter-leads-challenges","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13054","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"epic_block_11"};
\n
In their new role as Chapter Leads, they will have to unlearn some of the past approaches and learn a few new things:
\u2013 They need to let go of the past control-oriented ownership. And need to let go of the hierarchical mindset, as the new structure brings a matrix-oriented way of engaging.
\u2013 They need to embrace more facilitative and collaborative approaches as they need to engage with different components of the flat network-oriented organization.
\u2013 They need to learn to work with shared accountability and responsibilities that come in the matrix structure, which require more of networking, relationship-building and influencing skills. They need to be more self-organizing, taking ownership and reaching out to different parts of the matrix organization as needed.
\u2013 Trying to define the roles very clearly in a matrix structure will lead to creating silos as people will tend to go by the role specification; but this is an antipattern of matrix structure which is designed for breaking down silos. Hence the roles will have certain fuzziness and overlap which the Chapter Leads need to learn to work with\/leverage.
\u2013 They need to develop more servant leadership qualities to develop people capabilities & competencies.
In summary, Chapter Leads need to focus on adopting to new mindset more than the new processes.
As Sivaguru puts it, Tribes are about Purpose, Squads are about Autonomy and Chapters are about Mastery. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Chow #153 - Chapter Leads' Challenges","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"chow-153-chapter-leads-challenges","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13054","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"epic_block_11"};
\n
In their new role as Chapter Leads, they will have to unlearn some of the past approaches and learn a few new things:
\u2013 They need to let go of the past control-oriented ownership. And need to let go of the hierarchical mindset, as the new structure brings a matrix-oriented way of engaging.
\u2013 They need to embrace more facilitative and collaborative approaches as they need to engage with different components of the flat network-oriented organization.
\u2013 They need to learn to work with shared accountability and responsibilities that come in the matrix structure, which require more of networking, relationship-building and influencing skills. They need to be more self-organizing, taking ownership and reaching out to different parts of the matrix organization as needed.
\u2013 Trying to define the roles very clearly in a matrix structure will lead to creating silos as people will tend to go by the role specification; but this is an antipattern of matrix structure which is designed for breaking down silos. Hence the roles will have certain fuzziness and overlap which the Chapter Leads need to learn to work with\/leverage.
\u2013 They need to develop more servant leadership qualities to develop people capabilities & competencies.
In summary, Chapter Leads need to focus on adopting to new mindset more than the new processes.
As Sivaguru puts it, Tribes are about Purpose, Squads are about Autonomy and Chapters are about Mastery. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Chow #153 - Chapter Leads' Challenges","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"chow-153-chapter-leads-challenges","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13054","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"epic_block_11"};
\n
In their new role as Chapter Leads, they will have to unlearn some of the past approaches and learn a few new things:
\u2013 They need to let go of the past control-oriented ownership. And need to let go of the hierarchical mindset, as the new structure brings a matrix-oriented way of engaging.
\u2013 They need to embrace more facilitative and collaborative approaches as they need to engage with different components of the flat network-oriented organization.
\u2013 They need to learn to work with shared accountability and responsibilities that come in the matrix structure, which require more of networking, relationship-building and influencing skills. They need to be more self-organizing, taking ownership and reaching out to different parts of the matrix organization as needed.
\u2013 Trying to define the roles very clearly in a matrix structure will lead to creating silos as people will tend to go by the role specification; but this is an antipattern of matrix structure which is designed for breaking down silos. Hence the roles will have certain fuzziness and overlap which the Chapter Leads need to learn to work with\/leverage.
\u2013 They need to develop more servant leadership qualities to develop people capabilities & competencies.
In summary, Chapter Leads need to focus on adopting to new mindset more than the new processes.
As Sivaguru puts it, Tribes are about Purpose, Squads are about Autonomy and Chapters are about Mastery. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Chow #153 - Chapter Leads' Challenges","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"chow-153-chapter-leads-challenges","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13054","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"epic_block_11"};
\n
In their new role as Chapter Leads, they will have to unlearn some of the past approaches and learn a few new things:
\u2013 They need to let go of the past control-oriented ownership. And need to let go of the hierarchical mindset, as the new structure brings a matrix-oriented way of engaging.
\u2013 They need to embrace more facilitative and collaborative approaches as they need to engage with different components of the flat network-oriented organization.
\u2013 They need to learn to work with shared accountability and responsibilities that come in the matrix structure, which require more of networking, relationship-building and influencing skills. They need to be more self-organizing, taking ownership and reaching out to different parts of the matrix organization as needed.
\u2013 Trying to define the roles very clearly in a matrix structure will lead to creating silos as people will tend to go by the role specification; but this is an antipattern of matrix structure which is designed for breaking down silos. Hence the roles will have certain fuzziness and overlap which the Chapter Leads need to learn to work with\/leverage.
\u2013 They need to develop more servant leadership qualities to develop people capabilities & competencies.
In summary, Chapter Leads need to focus on adopting to new mindset more than the new processes.
As Sivaguru puts it, Tribes are about Purpose, Squads are about Autonomy and Chapters are about Mastery. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Chow #153 - Chapter Leads' Challenges","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"chow-153-chapter-leads-challenges","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13054","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"epic_block_11"};
\n
In their new role as Chapter Leads, they will have to unlearn some of the past approaches and learn a few new things:
\u2013 They need to let go of the past control-oriented ownership. And need to let go of the hierarchical mindset, as the new structure brings a matrix-oriented way of engaging.
\u2013 They need to embrace more facilitative and collaborative approaches as they need to engage with different components of the flat network-oriented organization.
\u2013 They need to learn to work with shared accountability and responsibilities that come in the matrix structure, which require more of networking, relationship-building and influencing skills. They need to be more self-organizing, taking ownership and reaching out to different parts of the matrix organization as needed.
\u2013 Trying to define the roles very clearly in a matrix structure will lead to creating silos as people will tend to go by the role specification; but this is an antipattern of matrix structure which is designed for breaking down silos. Hence the roles will have certain fuzziness and overlap which the Chapter Leads need to learn to work with\/leverage.
\u2013 They need to develop more servant leadership qualities to develop people capabilities & competencies.
In summary, Chapter Leads need to focus on adopting to new mindset more than the new processes.
As Sivaguru puts it, Tribes are about Purpose, Squads are about Autonomy and Chapters are about Mastery. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Chow #153 - Chapter Leads' Challenges","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"chow-153-chapter-leads-challenges","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13054","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"epic_block_11"};
\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
In their new role as Chapter Leads, they will have to unlearn some of the past approaches and learn a few new things:
\u2013 They need to let go of the past control-oriented ownership. And need to let go of the hierarchical mindset, as the new structure brings a matrix-oriented way of engaging.
\u2013 They need to embrace more facilitative and collaborative approaches as they need to engage with different components of the flat network-oriented organization.
\u2013 They need to learn to work with shared accountability and responsibilities that come in the matrix structure, which require more of networking, relationship-building and influencing skills. They need to be more self-organizing, taking ownership and reaching out to different parts of the matrix organization as needed.
\u2013 Trying to define the roles very clearly in a matrix structure will lead to creating silos as people will tend to go by the role specification; but this is an antipattern of matrix structure which is designed for breaking down silos. Hence the roles will have certain fuzziness and overlap which the Chapter Leads need to learn to work with\/leverage.
\u2013 They need to develop more servant leadership qualities to develop people capabilities & competencies.
In summary, Chapter Leads need to focus on adopting to new mindset more than the new processes.
As Sivaguru puts it, Tribes are about Purpose, Squads are about Autonomy and Chapters are about Mastery. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Chow #153 - Chapter Leads' Challenges","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"chow-153-chapter-leads-challenges","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13054","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"epic_block_11"};
\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
In their new role as Chapter Leads, they will have to unlearn some of the past approaches and learn a few new things:
\u2013 They need to let go of the past control-oriented ownership. And need to let go of the hierarchical mindset, as the new structure brings a matrix-oriented way of engaging.
\u2013 They need to embrace more facilitative and collaborative approaches as they need to engage with different components of the flat network-oriented organization.
\u2013 They need to learn to work with shared accountability and responsibilities that come in the matrix structure, which require more of networking, relationship-building and influencing skills. They need to be more self-organizing, taking ownership and reaching out to different parts of the matrix organization as needed.
\u2013 Trying to define the roles very clearly in a matrix structure will lead to creating silos as people will tend to go by the role specification; but this is an antipattern of matrix structure which is designed for breaking down silos. Hence the roles will have certain fuzziness and overlap which the Chapter Leads need to learn to work with\/leverage.
\u2013 They need to develop more servant leadership qualities to develop people capabilities & competencies.
In summary, Chapter Leads need to focus on adopting to new mindset more than the new processes.
As Sivaguru puts it, Tribes are about Purpose, Squads are about Autonomy and Chapters are about Mastery. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Chow #153 - Chapter Leads' Challenges","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","post_password":"","post_name":"chow-153-chapter-leads-challenges","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_modified_gmt":"2024-01-29 15:20:22","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"http:\/\/pm-powerconsulting.com\/?p=13054","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":2},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_3o3","class":"epic_block_11"};
\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n